Walsh v. Department of the Navy
| Captain Rory M. Walsh |
| Department of the Navy and United States of America |
| 4:2023cv04164 |
| October 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Addendum of service effected Third Addendum of Service with evidence served on Defendants' Counsel of Record on 12/04/2023, filed by Rory M. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Walsh, Rory) |
| Filing 16 BRIEF by Plaintiff Rory M. Walsh re #13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #12 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint MOTION to DISMISS pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5) MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendants motion to dismiss or to strike (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement of Material Facts not in dispute, #2 Proposed Order Brief in Opposition to Dismiss Draft Order, #3 Certificate of Service) (Walsh, Rory) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Affidavit of Service; Second Addendum served on Defendants' Counsel of Record on 12/04/2023, filed by Rory M. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Walsh, Rory) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to USA Attorney General Merrick B. Garland US Department of Justice. Summmons(es) delivered to Roy Walsh via hand-delivery. (KLE) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint MOTION to DISMISS pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5) MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by Department of the Navy, United States of America. (Bengford, Stephanie) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint , MOTION to DISMISS pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(5), MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim by Department of the Navy, United States of America. (Bengford, Stephanie) |
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER granting 5 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 11/3/23. (KMH)
|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service Addendum filed by Rory M. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Enclosure (1), #2 Affidavit of Service; Addendum Certificate of Service)(DJP) |
| NOTICE of Filing Error (missing pages): #8 Return of Service was filed in error and should be disregarded. (DJP) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Rory M. Walsh. (DJP) |
| Filing 8 (FILED IN ERROR) RETURN OF SERVICE as to United States of America served on 10/23/2023. Department of The Navy Summons returned UnExecuted see Enclosure (2). (KLE) Modified on 10/30/2023 (DJP). |
| Filing 7 ADMISSION of Service of Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney's Office on 10/23/2023, filed by Department of the Navy, United States of America. (Bengford, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie C. Bengford on behalf of All Defendants. (Bengford, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Electronically File Documents pursuant to e-filing registration request submitted through PACER. Pro se party Rory M. Walsh will now begin receiving electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DJP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with the filing fee and completed summonses. A new case has been opened. Your summmons have been issued. You are responsible for arranging service of the summons and complaint on the defendant(s). Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. (CLR) Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Pursuant to the E-Government Act and D.S.D. Civ. LR 5.2, you must redact personal identifiers from documents submitted to the Court. The Clerks Office will not review for compliance. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to USA. 2 Summmons, 3 AO 85 Forms, and Rule 73 Memo provided to pro se plaintiff over counter at SF Clerk's Office. (CLR) |
| Filing 2 REGISTRATION for Electronic Notice by Rory M. Walsh. Pro se party Rory M. Walsh will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (CLR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT , $402 fee paid, receipt #400002560, filed by Rory M. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-6) (CLR) Modified on 10/17/2023 to add payment information. (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
