Roberts v. USA et al
| Timothy Munro Roberts |
| USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden, Dr. Rock Boyd, Naphcare and Estill, FPC, Warden |
| 4:2023cv04166 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
(FILED IN ERROR - WRONG CASE) Summons Issued as to Rock Boyd. One Summons, USM 285 and copies of Docs. 1 and 9 delivered via hand delivery to USMS. (DJP) (Main Document 7 replaced and regenerated on 12/5/2023 due to two case numbers on docs)
|
|
NOTICE of Filing Error: #7 Summons Issued was filed in error (filed in wrong case) and should be disregarded. (DJP)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 1915 SCREENING. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/17/2023. (DJP)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Case 4:23-cv-4166 shall be consolidated into 4:23-cv-4116, with the lead case being 4:23-cv-4116. All future filings shall be filed in 4:23-cv-4116.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/30/2023. (DJP)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Timothy Munro Roberts. (DJP)
|
|
NO FURTHER DOCKETING IN THIS CASE; ALL FURTHER DOCKETING TO BE DONE IN LEAD CASE 4:23-CV-4116. (DJP)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 10/23/2023. (DJP)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Civil Rights Complaint that was transferred to our District from the District of South Carolina. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees and Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury. Copy of docket sheet and Application to Proceed IFP sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Pursuant to the E-Government Act and D.S.D. Civ. LR 5.2, you must redact personal identifiers from documents submitted to the Court. The Clerks Office will not review for compliance. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 1
Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 1:23-cv-03692-DCC filed by Timothy Munro Roberts. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (SAC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
