Johnson v. O'Donnell
Blake Jeffrey Johnson |
W. O'Donnell |
4:2024cv04012 |
January 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Veronica L Duffy |
Karen E Schreier |
Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Brief in RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by Blake Jeffrey Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (SKK) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice on 1/26/24 (SKK) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of L. ALLEN re #7 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction; MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 10/27/23 Memo., #2 Exhibit B - Public Information Inmate Data, #3 Exhibit C - Inmate Profile, #4 Exhibit D - FSA Time Credit Assessment, #5 Exhibit E - Admin. Remedy Generalized Retrieval) (Svennes, Sharla) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by W. O'Donnell. (Svennes, Sharla) |
Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim by W. O'Donnell. (Svennes, Sharla) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Federal Bureau of Prisons on 1/24/24 (SKK) |
Filing 5 Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorney as to W. O'Donnell. Attorney Sharla Svennes added. Attorney Civil United States Attorney terminated. (Svennes, Sharla) |
Filing 4 NOTICE re: Rule 73 (Memorandum attached). (Attachments: #1 AO 85 Form). MAILED to Mr. Johnson. (SAC) |
TEXT CERTIFICATE OF CLERK - The Clerk has served an AO85 and a copy/copies of #3 Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2241) on the Respondent and the following: - United States Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, via certified mail, return receipt requested; - Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons,320 First St., NW, Washington, DC 20534, via certified mail, return receipt requested; - Diana Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota, Civil Division, via electronic delivery. (ARW) |
Filing Fee Received from Blake Jeffrey Johnson. Fee Amount: $5, Receipt No.: #400002959. (SKK) |
Filing 3 ORDER. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 1/19/2024. (Mailed Docket Nos. 1 & 1-1 & Order to respondent W. O'Donnell (ARW). Mailed Order to Mr. Johnson Modified on 1/22/2024 (ARW). |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration AND Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.) Copy of docket sheet, motion to proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account form sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Pursuant to the E-Government Act and D.S.D. Civ. LR 5.2, you must redact personal identifiers from documents submitted to the Court. The Clerks Office will not review for compliance. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (ARW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2241 filed by Blake Jeffrey Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Mailed IFP Form and Prisoner Trust Account form for completion) (ARW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. O'Donnell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Blake Jeffrey Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: W. O'Donnell | |
Represented By: | Sharla Svennes |
Represented By: | Civil United States Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.