Empire Building Construction, LLC v. Empire Homes, LLC et al
| Empire Building Construction, LLC |
| Empire Homes, LLC and Empire Commercial, LLC |
| 4:2024cv04019 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Empire Building Construction, LLC. (Engel, Joel) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC identifying Corporate Parent EHPH, LLC for Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC. (Nichols, Shawn) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE (Corporate Disclosure Statement not filed). D.S.D. Civ. L.R. 7.1.1 requires non-governmental organizational parties or intervenors to file either a Corporate Disclosure Statement or a Certificate that Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 is not applicable within 14 days of the party or intervenors first pleading or entry of appearance. The deadline has passed and Empire Building Construction, LLC, Empire Commercial, LLC, and Empire Homes, LLC have not complied. Said parties have three business days to comply. Compliance may be achieved by docketing the statement or certificate in CM/ECF using the Corporate Disclosure Statement or Certificate of Non-Applicability event. (RRB) |
| Filing 9 REPLY to #7 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC. (Nichols, Shawn) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #4 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Empire Building Construction, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Letter, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Trademark Registrations) (Engel, Joel) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to DISMISS filed by All Plaintiffs. (Engel, Joel) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Judicial Notice re #4 MOTION to DISMISS by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Empire Secretary of State Results, #2 Exhibit 2- Empire Fictitious Name Filings, #3 Exhibit 3- Steel Erectors Inc Secretary of State filing) (Wilka, Claire) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC. (Wilka, Claire). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to DISMISS by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC. (Wilka, Claire) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Empire Commercial, LLC, Empire Homes, LLC UNOPPOSED. (Nichols, Shawn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn M. Nichols on behalf of All Defendants. (Nichols, Shawn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Minnehaha County, case number 49CIV24-000218. ($405 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-4211673). (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Ex. B - Admisson of Service)(SAC) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
