Hayward Baker, Inc. v. Shirttail Gulch Road District, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hayward Baker, Inc.
Defendant: Shirttail Gulch Road District, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2010cv05012
Filed: March 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Western Division Office
County: Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U. S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 9/10/12. (SB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayward Baker, Inc. v. Shirttail Gulch Road District, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hayward Baker, Inc.
Represented By: Robert L. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirttail Gulch Road District, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?