Sund v. Young et al
||Dennis Ray Sund
||Darin Young, Ed Ligtenberg and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
||October 16, 2014
||US District Court for the District of South Dakota
||Western Division Office
||Veronica L. Duffy
||Karen E. Schreier
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 13, 2015
ORDER denying as moot 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 12 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 13 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 14 Motion for Discovery; adopting 17 Report and Recommendation; overruling 18 Objection to Report and Recommendation. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 7/13/2015. (KC)
|February 4, 2015
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION for Discovery, 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 14 MOTION for Discovery, 12 MOTION for Discovery, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254), 6 MOTION to Dismiss . Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2015. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 2/4/2015. (CG) Modified by editing Document Type to Opinion on 2/5/2015 (DLC).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?