Hayes v. Acuity
Plaintiff: Kevin Hayes
Defendant: Acuity
Case Number: 5:2017cv05015
Filed: March 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Western Division Office
County: Custer
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L. Viken
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Leave to file a response; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 46 Motion to file a sur-reply brief. Signed by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 3/20/20. (SB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. Acuity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Hayes
Represented By: David S. Barari
Represented By: G. Verne Goodsell
Represented By: Michael J. Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acuity
Represented By: Thomas G. Fritz
Represented By: David J. Nowak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?