Dodd v. Jenkins et al
| Brian Dodd |
| Sam Jenkins and LEAPS Program |
| 5:2018cv05084 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Property Rights: Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Motion to Electronically File Documents in CM/ECF. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 12/7/18. (SB)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party Brian Dodd will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DJP) |
| Filing 6 New Case LETTER with enclosed copy of the docket sheet and Pro Se Litigant Application Form sent by Clerk's Office to Brian Dodd. (JLS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE/REPORT on Filing of Action Regarding Copyright mailed US Patent & Trademark Office. (JLS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Dodd. (JLS) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Brian Dodd. (Attachments: #1 Emails, #2 Copyright documents, #3 Website screen shots, #4 July 2018 Amended Joint Stipulated Settlement, #5 October 2012 Joint Stipulated Settlement) (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
