Kurtenbach v. Noem et al
| Matthew Kurtenbach |
| Cassie Wendt, Trevor Jones, Wendy Kloeppner, Jason Ravnsborg, Kristi Noem, The State of South Dakota Obligation Recovery Center and Scott Bollinger |
| 5:2019cv05042 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTER Received from Matthew Kurtenbach to Clerk of U.S. District Court. (SRA) |
| Filing 7 Mail sent to Matthew Kurtenbach was returned as undeliverable, plaintiff released, no new address given. #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis was returned. (SRA) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Prerequisite to Action by Matthew Kurtenbach. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(SRA) |
| Filing 5 Service LETTER with enclosed doc #4 , summons, USM 285s, samples, and AO85 sent by Clerk's Office to Matthew Kurtenbach. (SLW) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 6/3/19. (SB) Mailed to Plaintiff and Prison on 6/3/2019 (SLW).
|
| Filing 3 New Case LETTER with enclosed docket sheet sent by Clerk's Office to Matthew Kurtenbach. (SAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Kurtenbach. (SAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, filed by Matthew Kurtenbach. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
