New Holy et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
| Carolyn New Holy, Sandra Fire Lightning and Stephanie Star Comes Out |
| United States Department of Interior, John M. Long, Danielle Daughtery and Bureau of Indian Affairs |
| 5:2019cv05066 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/ Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Affidavit of Service served on Danelle Daugherty on September 26,2019, filed by Carolyn New Holy. (Sandven, Steven) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Affidavit served on Department of Interior on September 26,2019, filed by Carolyn New Holy. (Sandven, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of Interior. 1 Summmons, a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued - United States Department of the Interior, #2 AO 85 form)(JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400.00 fee paid, receipt# 0869-3152765) filed by Carolyn New Holy, Stephanie Star Comes Out, Sandra Fire Lightning in shell case on 9/13/2019. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
