Bucholz et al v. Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Benjamin Lieffort, Mical Bucholz and Luke Moen |
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company |
5:2020cv05011 |
February 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Karen E Schreier |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Discovery Report JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT AND SCHEDULING INFORMATION by Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company.(Arndt, Mark) |
Filing 6 ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/03/2020. (SAC) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company. (Arndt, Mark) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark J. Arndt on behalf of Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company. (Arndt, Mark) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE as to Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company served on 02/11/2020. (Barari, David) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company. Summons, Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO85 Form)(SAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400.00 fee paid, receipt# 0869-3255791) filed by Mical Bucholz, Benjamin Lieffort, Luke Moen in shell case on 02/07/2020. (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.