Palomarez v. Young
Defendant: Darin Young
Petitioner: Alexander Palomarez
Case Number: 5:2020cv05021
Filed: March 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Viken
Referring Judge: Daneta Wollmann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION AND/OR DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DISCRETIONARY REVIEW by Alexander Palomarez re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (SAC)
March 26, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 filed by Alexander Palomarez. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (SAC)
March 26, 2020 NOTICE - Case terminated per [Doc. 8] Order filed in case CV 19-5081. (SAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palomarez v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darin Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alexander Palomarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?