Osterbur v. Saul
| Glenn Andrew Osterbur |
| Andrew Saul |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 5:2020cv05073 |
| December 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Diana Ryan Acknowledgement filed by Glenn Andrew Osterbur. (Simpson, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Alison J. Ramsdell on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Ramsdell, Alison)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul in their official capacities. 1 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 AO 85)(SKK)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 12/17/20. (SB)
|
|
Filing 3
AFFIDAVIT in Support re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Glenn Andrew Osterbur. (MSB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Glenn Andrew Osterbur. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (MSB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT on Social Security Appeal filed by Glenn Andrew Osterbur. (MSB)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
