Chauncey v. Saul
| Thomas Chauncey |
| Andrew Saul |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 5:2021cv05014 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Daneta Wollmann |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Judge Jeffrey L. Viken no longer assigned to case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 4/26/21. (SB)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Thomas Chauncey, Andrew Saul. (MWT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Delia M. Druley (USA) on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to USA. Summmons(es), AO 85, and Rule 73 Memo delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery to plaintiffs attorney. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 AO85)(DJP) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 4/8/21. (SB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas Chauncey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (KLE) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/5/2021: #2 Affidavit in Support of Motion) (KLE). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT on Social Security Appeal. (KLE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
