Clervrain v. Boyer et al
| Manetirony Clervrain |
| Stephen A. Boyer, Pete Flores, Josh Haeder, Marcia Hultman, Carolyn H. Byrd, Don DeFosset, Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Zhanna Golodryga, John D. Johns, Joia M. Johnson, Ruth Ann Marshall, Charles D. McCrary, James T. Prokopanko, Lee J Styslinger, III, Jose S. Suquet, John M. Turner, Timothy Vines and Stephen Mish |
| 5:2022cv05037 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Charles B Kornmann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT of Dismissal (Clerk). (SKK) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #4 Motion for humanitarian reasons; denying as moot #5 Motion for Manifest Injustice Act or Electronic Filing Act; denying as moot #6 Motion for settlement agreement against secretive criminals. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 5/5/2022. (CLR) Mailed to Plaintiff with non-prisoner appeal packet. (CLR)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs. A new case has been opened. For a Plaintiff to be added to the docket sheet each must sign and date the Complaint. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Pro Se Litigant Registration Form for Electronic Notice also sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (CLR) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Settlement Agreement(s) Against Secretive Criminals by Invoking the National Regulatory Treaties Act ("NIRTA") by Manetirony Clervrain. (CLR) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for ["Manifest Injustice Act"] or ["Electronic Filling Act"] Opposition(s) by Secure Academic Resources Technology Act ("SARTA") by Manetirony Clervrain. (CLR) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for "Humanitarian Reasons" or Assure Family Unity in the Public Interest by National Treatment Principal Act ("NTPA") by Manetirony Clervrain. (CLR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for ["Alien Status"] or ["Pauperis Status"] or Criteria to Consider by Invoking the ANT(s) Movement Act ("TAMA") by Manetirony Clervrain. (CLR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Mitigating Financial Burden or ("IFP) Constitutional Issues by Massive Issues ["Right Aggravated"] Treatment Act by Manetirony Clervrain. (CLR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand. (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
