Baker v. Marsh
William Ray Baker |
James E. Marsh |
5:2022cv05068 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Charles B Kornmann |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 MOTION to Extend Deadlines to File Reply Brief. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 09/14/2022. (KLE) |
Filing 21 MOTION to Extend Deadlines to File Reply Brief by James E. Marsh. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE to #14 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (SLT) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to Docket #18 (Support of Response) filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits: misc. documentation in support of response) (KLE) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to #17 Response to Motion filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits: 0-8 misc. documentation in support of response) (KLE) |
Filing 17 FURTHER RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Email documentation) (KLE) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: Supporting documents) (KLE) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim filed by James E. Marsh. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 14 MOTION to DISMISS for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim by James E. Marsh. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT as to James E. Marsh by Plaintiff William Ray Baker re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Misc. Attachments as to Fed. Court Cases) (KLE) |
Filing 12 AMENDED DOCUMENT by William Ray Baker. Amendment to #10 Response. (Attachments: #1 Emails) (CLR) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Morris on behalf of James E. Marsh. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE and AMEND docket #6 Letter Received filed by William Ray Baker. (KLE) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant James E. Marsh on 08/12/2022 (KLE) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE and REPLY to #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by William Ray Baker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: Order 22-5068) (KLE) |
Filing Fee Received from William Ray Baker. Fee Amount: $402.00, Receipt No.: #500000100. (KLE) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 8/8/2022. (SLT) |
Filing 6 LETTER Received from Plaintiff to Judge Kornmann. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (TAL) |
Filing 5 LETTER Received from William R. Baker to Judge Kornmann. (Attachments: #1 Miscellaneous Exhibits) (CLR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (KLE) |
Filing 3 REGISTRATION for Electronic Notice by William Ray Baker. Pro se party William Ray Baker will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (KLE) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Ray Baker. (KLE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: Summons; Acknowlege Statement) (KLE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Baker v. Marsh | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William Ray Baker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James E. Marsh | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.