Kale v. Aero Simulation Inc.
Plaintiff: Matthew Kale
Defendant: Aero Simulation Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv05081
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Karen E Schreier
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Eduardo A. Suarez-Solar for Aero Simulation Inc.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/7/2022. (SAC) MAILED to Mr. Kale on 11/8/2022 (SAC).
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jounice Nealy-Brown for Aero Simulation Inc.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/07/2022. (SAC) MAILED to Mr. Kale on 11/8/2022 (SAC).
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Holly Griffin Goodman for Aero Simulation Inc.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/7/2022. (SAC) MAILED to Mr. Kale on 11/8/2022 (SAC).
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney Eduardo A. Suarez-Solar to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3913645) by Aero Simulation Inc.. (Hensley, Laura)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney Jounice L. Nealy-Brown to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3913637) by Aero Simulation Inc.. (Hensley, Laura)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney Holly Griffin Goodman to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3913618) by Aero Simulation Inc.. (Hensley, Laura)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura K. Hensley on behalf of Aero Simulation Inc.. (Hensley, Laura)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with the filing fee and completed summons. A new case has been opened. Your summmons were issued. You are responsible for arranging service of the summons and complaint on the defendant. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Pro Se Litigant Registration Form for Electronic Notice also sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (JLS)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Aero Simulation Inc.. 1 Summons delivered via hand delivery to Pro Se Plaintiff with blank AO85 form with a copy of Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (JLS)CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 form)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402.00 fee paid, receipt# 500000137. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kale v. Aero Simulation Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Kale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aero Simulation Inc.
Represented By: Laura K. Hensley
Represented By: Eduardo A. Suarez-Solar
Represented By: Holly Griffin Goodman
Represented By: Jounice Nealy-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?