Richmond v. Sullivan
| Daniel Sullivan |
| Herbert Lee Richmond |
| 5:2022cv05082 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting #10 Motion to Extend. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 10/14/22. (SKK)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Motion for Extension of Time to File Response by Daniel Sullivan. (Dempsey, Jacob). Added MOTION to Extend on 10/13/2022 (JLS). |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Herbert Lee Richmond. All Defendants. (Grey, Ellery) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Herbert Lee Richmond. Daniel Sullivan waiver sent on 9/23/2022, answer due 11/22/2022. (Grey, Ellery) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to John Fitzgerald on September 23, 2022 by Herbert Lee Richmond. (Grey, Ellery) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Daniel Sullivan, Warden on September 23, 2022 by Herbert Lee Richmond. (Grey, Ellery) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Mark Vargo on September 23, 2022 by Herbert Lee Richmond. (Grey, Ellery) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Ryan Dempsey on behalf of Daniel Sullivan. (Dempsey, Jacob) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND REQUIRING RESPONSE. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 09/30/2022. (VMM) On 09/30/2022, the Petition, Order, Clerks Notice of Rule 73 docket entry, and blank AO 85 was emailed to the 2254 Service Group Modified on 10/3/2022 (VMM).
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (VMM) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (VMM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 ($5.00 fee paid, receipt# 500000140). (VMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richmond v. Sullivan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Herbert Lee Richmond | |
| Represented By: | Ellery R. Grey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Daniel Sullivan | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Ryan Dempsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
