Lavelle et al v. United States of America, U.S. Forest Service
| Brenten Lavelle and Robin Lavelle |
| United States of America and United States Forest Service |
| 5:2023cv05070 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Charles B Kornmann |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michaele Sanders Hofmann on behalf of All Defendants. (Hofmann, Michaele) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States Forest Service, United States of America. 4 Summons(es) delivered via electronic delivery to counsel. CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (ARW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-4146344, in shell case on 10/23/2023 filed by Brenten Lavelle, Robin Lavelle. (ARW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
