Mathiesen v. Black Hills Special Services Cooperative et al
Julie Mathiesen |
Black Hills Special Services Cooperative, Members of the Black Hills Special Services Board of Directors, Katie Birchfield, Tammy Clem, Heather Grace, Tanya Gray, Susan Humiston, Anita Peterson, Robb Timm, Suzanne Rogers, Terry Koontz, Katie Merdanian, Kate Thomas, Erik Skavang, Joe Hauge and Pamela Lange |
5:2023cv05080 |
November 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Karen E Schreier |
Contract: Insurance |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Julie Mathiesen. All Defendants. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to All Defendants on 1/03/2024 by Julie Mathiesen. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. 15 Summonses delivered via electronic delivery to counsel. CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (ARW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.