Mercy v. Kouris et al
Michael Mercy |
Thanasis Kouris, Rapid City Police Department, City of Rapid City, Scott Lockyear, Oasis Lounge Inc. and Mountain States Security, Inc. |
5:2023cv05084 |
November 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/1/2024. All motions must be filed and served no later than 30 days prior to the Pretrial Conference. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 01/26/2024. (KLE) |
Filing 12 Discovery Report by Michael Mercy.(Collins, Jeffery) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Mountain States Security, Inc.. (Mann, Rebecca) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE (Corporate Disclosure Statement not filed). D.S.D. Civ. L.R. 7.1.1 requires non-governmental organizational parties or intervenors to file either a Corporate Disclosure Statement or a Certificate that Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 is not applicable within 14 days of the party or intervenors first pleading or entry of appearance. The deadline has passed and Mountain States Security, Inc. has not complied. Said party has three business days to comply. Compliance may be achieved by docketing the statement or certificate in CM/ECF using the Corporate Disclosure Statement or Certificate of Non-Applicability event. (RRB) |
Filing 9 ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 12/14/2023. (KLE) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Scott Lockyear. (Mann, Rebecca) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca L. Mann on behalf of Scott Lockyear, Mountain States Security, Inc.. (Mann, Rebecca) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Mountain States Security, Inc.. (Erlandson, Gregory) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory J. Erlandson on behalf of Mountain States Security, Inc.. (Erlandson, Gregory) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Rapid City, Thanasis Kouris, Rapid City Police Department. (Abraham, Douglas) |
Filing 3 I have reviewed Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requiring nongovernmental corporate parties or nongovernmental corporations that seek to intervene to file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock and certify that it does not apply to Oasis Lounge, Inc.. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Oasis Lounge Inc.. (Morris, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Rapid City, Thanasis Kouris, Rapid City Police Department from Seventh Judicial Circuit, case number 51CIV23-001430. ($402 fee paid, receipt# 300000419) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2: Amended Complaint, #3 State Court Amended Summons, #4 State Court Consent to Federal Removal by Oasis Longe, Inc.)(KLE) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KLE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.