Deleon v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department et al
Alberto E Deleon |
Woodall, Papillion, Parsons, Swoopes, Coppinger, Hamilton County, Tennessee, Jim Hammond, Bonar, Wilhoit, Erlanger Health Systems, Barker, Bill Wilson and Robert Stoakes |
1:2012cv00068 |
March 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Chattanooga Office |
Hamilton |
William B Carter |
Harry S Mattice |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM: the Court concludes Defendants Wilhoit, Erlanger Health Systems, Dr. Barker, and Dr. Papillion will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs complaint agai nst the remaining defendants will be DISMISSED sua sponte in its entirety for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (Court Doc. 2), his motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART (Court Doc . 1), and his other motions will be DENIED (Court Doc. 3, 5, 7, 7-1, 8, 9, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, & 22). Plaintiff will be ASSESSED and SHALL pay the civil filing fee ofthree-hundred and fifty dollars ($350.00) under the Prison Litigation Refor m Act. An appropriate judgment will enter. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 7/31/2012. (BJL)Mailed to Deleon, Hamilton County Jail, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.