Majors v. Coffee County et al
| Johnathan M Majors |
| Lisa Swallows, Coffee County, Brandon Thomas and Amanda Peters |
| 1:2019cv00197 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Even liberally construing the complaint in favor of Plaintiff, it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 1983 as to any Defendant. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915(A). Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/12/19. (copy mailed to Johnathan M Majors at 1637 Lillian Ct., Columbia, TN 38401) (JBR)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/12/19. (copy mailed to Johnathan M Majors at 1637 Lillian Ct., Columbia, TN 38401) (JBR) |
| Filing 4 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, he has been released. Mail sent to Johnathan Majors. (SAC) |
| Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (SAC)Mailed to Majors. |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Coffee County, Amanda Peters, Lisa Swallows, Brandon Thomas, filed by Johnathan M Majors.(SAC) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnathan M Majors. (Attachments: #1 Letter and Envelope)(SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
