Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Zanfardino v. Superior Court of Coffee County
as 4:2026cv00260
Petitioner:
Alexiy Zanfardino
Respondent:
Superior Court of Coffee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paulk v. Coffee County Board of Education
as 5:2026cv00954
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Paulk
Defendant:
Coffee County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zanfardino v. Superior Court of Coffee County
as 5:2026cv00855
Petitioner:
Alexiy Zanfardino
Respondent:
Superior Court of Coffee County
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keckritz v. State of TN et al
as 4:2026cv00038
Plaintiff:
Hugh Adam Keckritz
Defendant:
State of TN, John Doe, Coffee County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-11286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keuter v. Royal et al
as 3:2025cv00109
Plaintiff:
Joseph Duane Keuter, III
Defendant:
Amy Royal, Sim Davidson, Tim Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Kirby et al
as 4:2025cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reese
Defendant:
f/n/u Kirby and Coffee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buddy Baker v. Coffee County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 25-5971
Plaintiff:
BUDDY RAY BAKER
Defendant:
COFFEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and OFFICER WISER
Logsdon v. Coffee County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00820
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Logsdon
Defendant:
Coffee County Jail, Corey Jackson and Officer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
