Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Landon Harrod v. Kenya Lee, et al
as 24-5228
Plaintiff:
LANDON HARROD
Defendant:
KENYA LEE, ROCKY RUEHLING, CITY OF TULLAHOMA, TN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Oppenheimer v. Coffee County Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Coffee County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cargile v. Meeks et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shane Cargile
Defendant:
Isaac Meeks and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne v. Basaldua et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bianca Clayborne
Defendant:
Ruben Basaldua, Donnie Clark, Douglas Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Justin Phillips
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Steven Austin Qualls, Blake Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olivia Coley-Pearson v. Emily Martin, et al
as 23-13249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLIVIA COLEY-PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EMILY MISTY MARTIN, JOE STEWART, ROBERT SPRINKLE and others
Dalrymple v. Coffee County, Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Dalrymple
Defendant:
Coffee County, Alabama, Coffee County Sheriff's Department and Scott Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Coffee County Government
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Carey Baldwin
Defendant:
Coffee County Government and Coffee County, TN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
