Erwin v. Greene County, Tennessee et al (TV3)
Beunos Lee Erwin |
Michael Jones and Greene County, Tennessee |
2:2018cv00161 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Thomas A Varlan |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael Jones. Michael Jones waiver sent on 10/15/2018. (Woolsey, Roger) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Greene County, Tennessee. Greene County, Tennessee waiver sent on 10/15/2018. (Woolsey, Roger) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/24/18. (JBR) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/24/18. (JBR) |
Filing 3 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/24/18. (JBR) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Greene County, Tennessee, Michael Jones. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued - Michael Jones) (JBR) |
Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Clifton L Corker added. (JBR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3775057.), filed by Beunos Lee Erwin. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Greene County, Tennessee, #3 Summons Michael Jones)(Baker, Lance) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.