Cases 1 - 10 of 647
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00656
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Jones v. Director
as 1:2024cv00288
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County, Tippecanoe County Sheriff, Jared Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Putman et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Erwin D. Martin
Defendant:
Eric Putman, f/n/u Allen, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The City of New York
as 24-1388
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Former Mayor of New York City, ERIC GONZALEZ, Kings County District Attorney and others
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Defendant:
Miami Gardens Police Department and Miami Dade County Police Department
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03852
Plaintiff:
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC and THE BALDWIN GROUP COLLEAGUE, INC.
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
