Johnson v. Facebook et al
| Robert W Johnson |
| Facebook, Meta LLC., Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffrey Clark, Jenna Ellis, Ray Smith, Robert Cheeley, Cathleen Latham, Scott Hall, Stephen Lee, Harrison Floyd, Trevian Kutt, Sidney Powell, Misty Hampton, Michael Roman, David Shafer, Shawn Still, Vladimir Putin and Twitter |
| 2:2023cv00116 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Cynthia R Wyrick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Judicial Malpractice, Pro Se Corporation, Ethics and Government and Rico Act Crimes by Robert W Johnson (LCK) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 11/1/23. (CNC)Mailed to Robert Johnson (CNC) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM & ORDER adopting #7 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 11/1/23. (CNC)Mailed to Robert Johnson (CNC)
|
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W Johnson, #2 Complaint filed by Robert W Johnson. For reasons stated above, this Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. 1] seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 2] be DISMISSED. See Report and Recommendations for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 10/16/2023. (Copy of Report and Recommendations mailed to Robert Johnson) (CAT) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion [Doc. 5] to admit counsel and enter default judgment is DENIED without prejudice. (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 09/27/2023. (Copy mailed to Robert W Johnson). (AGG)
|
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Robert W Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Other envelope)(KSH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order within which to file (1) a completed Application to Proceed without prepayment of fees and (2) an amended complaint that sets forth the additional factual detail necessary to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that if he fails to timely file a complete Application to Proceed requesting to proceed in forma pauperis, this Court shall presume that Plaintiff is not a pauper and shall recommend to the District Court that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. Plaintiff is further NOTIFIED that failure to file an amended complaint which includes the necessary factual support for Plaintiff's claims, will result in this Court recommending to the District Court that Plaintiffs claims be dismissed, because Plaintiff's initial complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 09/13/2023. (Copy of Order mailed to Robert Johnson) (CAT)
|
| Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (Copy of Notice mailed to Robert W. Johnson)(JCK) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Robert W Johnson.(JCK) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert W Johnson. (JCK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
