Cases 1 - 10 of 100
EICHLER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2026cv02592
Plaintiff:
DARIUSZ J. EICHLER, LIZZIE FINNEY, ARLESIA FINNEY and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Smith v. Day
as 26-30437
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Smith
Respondent:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Rayburn Correctional Center
Porter v. Porter et al
as 1:2026cv00089
Plaintiff:
Willie Delois Porter
Defendant:
Paul Porter, Johnnie Smith, Sammie Ray Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
CARMICHAEL v. WERTZ, et al.
as 2:2026cv00923
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
MICHAEL WERTZ and RAY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joiner v. Kelly et al
as 3:2026cv00154
Defendant:
Sharron Kelly, Ray Smith, Regina Tanner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
L.J. Joiner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. HERTZFELD et al
as 1:2026cv00739
Petitioner:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Respondent:
ANDREA L. HERTZFELD, ALBERT AMISSAH and SUMURI A. ISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cano et al v. JDM Expedite Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Amiah Ellaine Cano and Erik Lopez
Defendant:
JDM Expedite Inc., JDM Expedite LLC, JDM Equipment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Garry Gallardo v. Donald Trump, et al
as 26-5001
Plaintiff:
Garry David Gallardo, Dallas Weber, Jr., George M. Lecco and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Pamela J. Bondi, in her official capacity as United States Attorney General, Alice Marie Johnson, in her official capacity as United States Pardon Czar and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
