Miller v. Parker et al (JRG2)
| Donald Craig Miller |
| Tony Parker, Jimmy J.J. Jones, Tim Burchett, Cooper, Wise, Horselby, Issac, Jones and Unknown Defendants |
| 3:2017cv00371 |
| August 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT ORDER; Defendant's motion to dismiss this action based on Plaintiff's failure to advise the Court of his change of address 36 will be GRANTED, and the motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations 34 will be DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 3/2/20. (c/m) (ADA)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 MOTION for Status filed by Donald Craig Miller, granting 16 MOTION for Status filed by Donald Craig Miller. Based on the foregoing, Jimmy J.J. Jones, Tim Burchett, Lt. Cooper, Wise, H orselby, Jones, and Unknown Defendants are DISMISSED as Defendants in this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. However, Plaintiff's failure to protect claim against Defendant Isaac will advance. The Clerk is DIR ECTED to send Plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendant Isaac. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the service packet and return it to the Clerk's Office within twenty (20) days of receipt of this order. At that t ime, the summons will be signed and sealed by the Clerk and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service.As to Plaintiff's motions for a status update [Docs. 14, 16], these motions are GRANTED to the extent that this Order is being entered.Plaintif f is further ORDERED to immediately inform the Court and Defendant Isaac or Defendant Isaac's counsel of record of any address changes in writing. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 02/25/2019. (Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Service packet mailed to Donald Craig Miller) (CAT)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In sum, Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 9] is DENIED AS MOOT and his motions to appoint counsel [Docs. 2 and 10] are DENIED. Moreover, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from th e date of entry of this Order to file an amended complaint. This amended complaint will completely supplant the previous complaint. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action for wa nt of prosecution and failure to comply with orders of the Court. Plaintiff's amended complaint must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and should contain only concisely stated claims for violations of civil rights, and clearly identify the specific causes of action that he wishes to pursue as to each defendant and the facts supporting each such claim. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a form § 1983 complaint which Plaintiff may use to draft this amended complaint.Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 02/22/2018. (Copy of Memorandum and Order and 1983 complaint form mailed to Donald Craig Miller) (CAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
