Marlow v. Blount County Jail et al
Nathaniel S Marlow |
Blount County Sheriff, Blount County Jail and Blount County Chief of Jail |
3:2021cv00151 |
April 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
H Bruce Guyton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. Plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account for the previous six-month period. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that if he fails to fully timely comply with this order, the Court shall presume that Plaintiff is not a pauper, shall assess the full amount of fees, and shall order the case dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 4/28/21. (c/m Nathaniel S Marlow 385837 BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY MARYVILLE, TN 37804 ) (ADA) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Nathaniel S Marlow #385837, BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY, MARYVILLE, TN 37804) (ABF) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nathaniel S Marlow.(ABF) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel S Marlow. (ABF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.