Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Fasold v. Blount County Jail
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Isiah Matthew Fasold
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simerly v. Blount County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Simerly
Defendant:
Blount County Jail Medical Staff and Nurse Brittany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erramraju v. Blount County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ramaraju Rom Erramraju
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mark Moon, Blount County Jail Medical Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Blount County Jail
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
James K. Taylor
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Blount County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shane Crow
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mark Moon and Cindy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Blount County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Terry Huffman, Jr
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mediko Correctional Healthcare, Sara LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin-Burge v. Cullman County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Shallowmist Martin-Burge
Defendant:
Cullman County Jail, J Black and Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Dentist of Blount County Jail
as 2:2021cv00875
Plaintiff:
Jacob Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Dentist of Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlow v. Blount County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel S Marlow
Defendant:
Blount County Sheriff, Blount County Jail and Blount County Chief of Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Blount County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00466
Defendant:
Chris Cantrell, T Hutsell, Perry Covington and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
