Messner v. Hickman Co. of Judicial
Plaintiff: Steven C. Messner
Defendant: Hickman Co. of Judicial, Hickman County, Hickman County Jail, Randal Ward, f/n/u Wasda and Christy Mays
Case Number: 1:2011cv00059
Filed: July 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Columbia Office
County: Hickman
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For these reasons, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 86 ) is adopted and approved. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 73 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The pretrial conference set for January 27, 2014, and the jury trial set for February 4, 2014, are canceled, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/2/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and the plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/25/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER : Plaintiff's counsel has filed a motion to extend time to respond to the pending motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 77 ). This motion is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's response shall be due on or before August 26, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/13/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 67 ), Objections filed by the Plaintiff in the form of a Motion for De Novo Determination and Supporting Memora ndum (Docket Nos. 68 and 69) and Defendant Cloud's Response thereto (Docket No. 70). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, t he Objections, the Response, and the file. Plaintiff's Objections are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 67 ) is adopted and approved. This case is in a different posture, with a different standa rd and different evidence before the Court than on Plaintiff's previous Motion to Amend. Defendant Cloud's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Cloud are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/10/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge hereby RECOMMENDS that Defendant Cloud's Motion for Summary Judgment 52 be GRANTED, and that this action against her be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/11/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: Telephone conference was held on 2/25/2013. After discussion with counsel the scheduling order is amended to provide that the Plaintiff's Rule 26 expert disclosures will be due on or before 4/29/2013. Defendants' Rule 26 expert di sclosures will be due on or before 6/4/2013. All discovery concerning all experts will be concluded by 7/8/2013. Dispositive motions will be due 8/19/2013. Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed within 28 days after service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/26/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER: Jury Trial set for 2/4/2014 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2014 at 1:00 PM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/20/2014. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 1/20/2014. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/14/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 CASE MANGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 3/5/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 7/15/2013. Telephone Conference set for 2/25/2013 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. To participate in the conference call, parties will call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/19/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER: For the reasons stated within this Order, the Report and Recommendation 24 is rejected. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 16 is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/10/12. (dt)
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Brown RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff'sMotion for Leave to Amend be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/19/12. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Messner v. Hickman Co. of Judicial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven C. Messner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickman Co. of Judicial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickman County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickman County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randal Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: f/n/u Wasda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christy Mays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?