Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ward v. Frink
as 1:2022cv01257
Petitioner:
Randall Ward
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Frink
as 1:2022cv01170
Petitioner:
Randall Ward
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Shreveport
as 5:2021cv03739
Plaintiff:
Randall Ward Anderson
Defendant:
City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53306
Plaintiff:
JASON RANDAL WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLFFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34318
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WARD WOLFFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04968
Plaintiff:
WARD and RANDALL WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03281
Plaintiff:
JOSUE GARZA, RYLAND EDWARDS, SAMUEL EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02225
Plaintiff:
Damaso Armas, Jr, Josue Garza, Ryland Edwards and others
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo, LLC and others
Harmon et al v. Hickman County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Harmon , Jenny Fagan and Edward Fagan
Defendant:
Hickman County, Tennessee , Randal Ward , Sondra Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. Ward et al
as 1:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Glenn Chandler
Defendant:
Randall Ward, Johnny Davis, Troy Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
