Mayberry v. Humphreys County et al
| Chris Scott Mayberry |
| Thelma Davidson, Theresa Howell, Brent Hubble, Bonnie Robertson, Humphreys County, Chris Davis, Larry Wallace, Lisa Donegan, Becky Cunningham, Jesse Wallace, Mike Mealler, Teddy Hooper, Tommy Ross, Will Hooper, David Flower, Brian Baker, Alan Wallace, Greg Ryan and George Maphai |
| 3:2011cv00855 |
| September 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Humphreys |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 106 Motion for Summary Judgment. The R&R is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in all respects. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 106 ) is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED WI TH PREJUDICE in its entirety. It is so ORDERED. This is the final order in this matter for purposes of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/22/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
130
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 106 ) of Defendants Humphreys County, Tennessee, Chris Davis, Becky Cunningham, Mike Mealler, Teddy Hooper, Tammy Ross, Will Hoope r, Bonnie Robertson, Thelma Davidson, Theresa Howell, Brent Hubble, Alan Wallace, Greg Ryan, Brian Baker, and David Flowers be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/24/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER: The defendants motion 109 for leave to file under seal several supporting documents attached to their motion is DENIED. The defendants have not set forth any persuasive basis for sealing the documents. The Clerk is directed to UNSEAL the doc uments (Docket Entry Nos. 110-115). The plaintiff shall have until 2/11/2013, to file a response to the motion for summary judgment. The evidentiary hearing scheduled in this action for 2/6/2013, is CANCELLED in light of the pending motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 12/31/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 86 Report and Recommendation. The case is RETURNED to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral Order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/28/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: Presently pending is the motion of Defendant George T. Mathai for summary judgment 36 . The plaintiff shall have until 2/29/2012, to file a response to the motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/23/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/16/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
