Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,752
Rachal v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff: Jeremy Rachal
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Timothy Hooper, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff: Calvin Walker
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff: Jesus Soliz
Defendant: Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
USA v. Tyrone Hooper
as 24-1440
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TYRONE LEKESE HOOPER
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff: ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Petitioner: Covonta Magee
Respondent: Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOPER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JOHN HOOPER
Defendant: Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Cameron Hays
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?