Lussi v. Professional Recovery Managment, Inc. et al
| Stacy D. Lussi |
| Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Professional Recovery Management, Inc. and Equifax, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00754 |
| July 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER: The court has been notified that this case has settled. A stipulation of dismissal or other settlement document shall be filed within 30 days of the entry of this Order. The jury trial set for 9/3/2013 and the pretrial conference set for 8/30/2013 are CANCELLED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/5/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: The court has been notified that plaintiff and defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have settled. A stipulation of dismissal or other settlement document shall be filed within 20 days of the entry of this Order. Counsel for defendant , Experian Information Solutions, Inc., do not have to appear for the initial case management conference set for 9/28/2012. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/27/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
