Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cox v. Professional Recovery Management Inc
as 4:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Kaylea Cox
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management Inc a Tennessee Corporation doing business as Fox Collection Center
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hendrix v. Professional Recovery Management Inc
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hendrix
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management Inc d/b/a Fox Collection Center, a Tennessee Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ford v. Professional Recovery Management Inc
as 5:2021cv00614
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management Inc a Tennessee corporation doing business as Fox Collection Center
Plaintiff:
Christina Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hamm v. Professional Recovery Management Inc
as 3:2020cv01011
Plaintiff:
Chris Hamm
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management Inc d/b/a Fox Collection Center, an Alabama corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Flores v. Professional Recovery Management, Inc.
as 2:2016cv14082
Plaintiff:
Krista Flores
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Flores v. Professional Recovery Management, Inc.
as 0:2016cv60539
Plaintiff:
Krista Flores
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Management, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
