Hamby v. Metro Nashville Police Department et al
| William Davidson Hamby, Jr. |
| Unknown Officers, f/n/u l/n/u, John Pryor, Bryan Johnson, Officers of Madison Area and Metro Nashville Police Department |
| 3:2012cv00879 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 86 Motion to Send Documents. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/5/2014. (xc: Complaint & Local Rules to Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds) (Main Document 87 replaced on 9/5/2014) (ds).
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER: The Court finds merit in the defendants' objections and said objections are SUSTAINED. The plaintiff has failed to state a claim against the remaining defendants. For that reason, those claims are DENIED and the instant action is hereby DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this matter.It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/31/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER: The motion to ascertain status (Docket Entry No. 63) is GRANTED. The plaintiff's motion for the assistance of counsel (Docket Entry No. 67) is DENIED. The plaintiff's motions to amend (Docket Entry Nos. 66 and 70) are GRANTED in pa rt. The plaintiff's remaining motions (Docket Entry Nos. 62, 64, and 65) are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/2/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail along w/copy of docket sheet)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
57
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that: 1. the Plaintiff's claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, illegal search, lack of due process upon his arrest, and conspiracy, bias, and negligen ce related to his arrest and the charges brought against him be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. The Plaintiff's motion to amend and for an investigation (Docket Entry No. 54) be DENIED; 3. the Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket Entry No. 55) be GRANTED to the extent that the Plaintiff seeks to dismiss defendant Brian Johnson and be DENIED in all other respects. Defendant Brian Johnson should be DISMISSED from the action; and 4. Defendants MNPD and John Pryor be required to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's claims that his constitutional rights were violated by the manner in which he was treated after his arrest and by his conditions of confinement subsequent to his arrest. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 11/20/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER: On 1/29/2013, the Defendants filed a status report 35 , in which they stated that the plaintiff's underlying criminal charges are set for discussion in the Davidson County Criminal Court on 2/22/2013. Accordingly, this action remains S TAYED in accordance with the 10/19/2012, Order. Upon the resolution of the relevant state criminal proceedings involving the plaintiff, the parties shall file a notice with the Court stating the outcome of the proceedings. If the relevant state cri minal proceedings are still ongoing, the Defendants shall, by April 1, 2013, file a status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 2/7/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: The motion to ascertain status 25 is GRANTED. In light of the Orderstaying all proceedings in this action, the plaintiffs various other motions (Docket Entry Nos. 22-24, 26, and 28-30) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/25/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: The Defendants' motion to stay is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's motion for the case to proceed is DENIED. This action is STAYED during the period that the criminal charges remain pending and the state criminal proceedings are ongoing. In light of the this Order regarding the entry of a stay in this action, the plaintiff's various motions (Docket Entry Nos. 13-17 and 19) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/19/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
