Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Clatys Jenkins, Larry McCovery and John Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US Acquisition, LLC v. Kaizen Aviation, LLC et al
as 9:2022mc81106
Plaintiff:
US Acquisition, LLC
Defendant:
Kaizen Aviation, LLC, Anthony V Pugliese, III and Thaddeus John Pryor
US Acquisition, LLC v. Kaizen Aviation, LLC et al
as 9:2022mc81107
Plaintiff:
US Acquisition, LLC
Defendant:
Kaizen Aviation, LLC, Harold A Shafer, Anthony V. Pugliese, III and others
United States v. Nunn
as 22-8020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN PRYOR NUNN
US Acquisition, LLC v. Kaizen Aviation, LLC et al
as 8:2021mc00017
Defendant:
Anthony V. Publiese, III, Thaddeus John Pryor, Harold A. Shafer and others
Plaintiff:
US Acquisition, LLC
Aldridge et al v. Regions Bank
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Everett Mills, Rick Eldridge, Louis Frank Knight and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Blue Lake Recovery Company, LLC v. Thaddeus John Pryor, et al
as 8:2020mc00100
Not Classified By Court:
Blue Lake Recovery Company, LLC, assignee of U.S. Acquisition, Inc. and Blue Lake Recovery Company, LLC
Defendant:
Thaddeus John Pryor and Anthony Pugliese, III
Plaintiff:
US Acquisition, LLC
Blue Lake Recovery Company, LLC v. Pryor
as 1:2020cv03460
Plaintiff:
Blue Lake Recovery Company, LLC
Defendant:
Thaddeus John Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Easterling Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
