Malone v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
| Aaron Malone |
| CCA, Brown, Glenda, Jane Doe, Presley, Adams, Ford and Cherry Lindamood |
| 3:2013cv01212 |
| November 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On March 25, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 73 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made th e findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants Nurse Brown, Nurse Glenda, and Physician Director Doctor Jane Doe are DISMISSED from this action without preju dice Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/21/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Copy by regular and certified mail to Davidson County Circuit Court Clerk.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) Modified on 5/22/2015 (afs).
|
|
Filing
73
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 MOTION to Dismiss: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that: 1. Defendants Nurse Brown, Nurse Glenda, and Physician Director Doctor Jane Doe be DISMISSED from this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 2) the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 40) of Defendant CCA be GRANTED to the extent that Defendant CCA requests that the Court not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim brought against it; and 3) this action be REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Davidson County, Tennessee, where it was originally filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/25/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER: Although the plaintiff attached certain documents to his objection, he has not apprised this court of the basis of his appeal. Moreover, the magistrate judges ruling, based on the scheduling order entered in the case on August 6, 2014, was not clearly erroneous or is contrary to law. The plaintiff's objection is therefore OVERRULED, and the court DECLINES to modify or set aside any part of that order (ECF No. 55 ). It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/2/15.(xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/11/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
