Bennett v. Scholfield et al
| Corey Alan Bennett |
| Derrick Scholfield, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall, Mandy Ellis, Javin Griffin, Barry Fisher, Rossi Jackson, Nathan Miller, Ramon Sherrell and Bill Haslem |
| 3:2015cv00401 |
| April 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On January 26, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 59), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. This order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/12/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
59
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/26/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
