Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Michael Parris, Brandon Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Jamon Robinson and Corey Alan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Watwood et al
as 3:2019cv00567
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Tony Mays, Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Turner et al
as 3:2018cv00619
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Special Agent Nathan Miller, Sgt. Denecia Bah-Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones and Corey Alan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Korey Cooper, Donna Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 3:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Korey Cooper, Robin Fish, Dan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Parker, et al.
as 3:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Donna Turner, Mandy Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Turner et al
as 3:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Donna Turner, Ramon Sherrell, Rossi Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Sherrell, et al
as 3:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Ramon Sherrell, Andrew Brown, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. McClure et al
as 3:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Brandi McClure, David Bruce Westbrooks, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Bennett v. Derrick Scholfield, et al
as 16-5740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK SCHOLFIELD, TDOC Commissioner, TONY PARKER, Assistant Commissioner of Prison Operations, JASON WOODALL, Deputy Commissioner of Operations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
