Walker v. Phillips et al
Joseph Walker |
Shawn Phillips, Clint Shannon and Robert Young |
3:2018cv00714 |
August 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank application to proceed IFP. If Plaintiff seeks to have this court consider his complaint, he MUST either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or complete the application to proceed IFP and return the properly completed application to the Court. Plaintiff's submission must be RECEIVED in this court within 30 days of the date this Order is entered on the docket. The submission must include the docket number assigned to this case, No. 3:18-cv-00714. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/20/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail w/ IFP.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service filed by Joseph Walker. (dt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shawn Phillips, Clint Shannon, Robert Young, filed by Joseph Walker.(afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.