Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 263
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner: Mario Keene
Respondent: Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Carpenter v. Shawn Phillips
as 24-5356
Petitioner: DARRELL CARPENTER
Respondent: SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Gaston v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv04021
Petitioner: Shawn Phillip Gaston
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff: PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant: TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Emmanuel HoustonIn re: Emmanuel Houston
as 24-5233
Petitioner: In re: EMMANUEL BIBB HOUSTON
Respondent: SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Houston v. Phillips We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner: Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent: Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: Tareynton Reshard Rogers
Defendant: Frank Strada, Shawn Phillips and Joshua Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hempstead v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Harold Hempstead
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montez Adams
as 24-5088
Petitioner: In re: MONTEZ ADAMS
Respondent: WARDEN SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Overocker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03004
Plaintiff: Shawn Phillip Overocker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?