Johnson v. O'Neill et al
| Robert Earl Johnson, Jr. |
| William Cohen, Dan Hamm, Sean O'Neill, Karl Dean, Jodie Bell and Wendy Tucker |
| 3:2019cv00507 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re: #10 Order. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (jm) |
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court finds the complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted under Section 1983. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Those claims, therefore, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, Plaintiff's state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE should Plaintiff wish to pursue them in a Tennessee state court. Because an appeal would NOT be taken in good faith, Plaintiff is NOT certified to pursue an appeal from this judgment in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). This is the final Order denying all relief in this case. The Clerk SHALL enter judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/12/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/12/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) |
| Filing 8 RECEIPT #34675055624 in the amount of $400.00 posted by Robert Earl Johnson, Jr re #1 Complaint. (am) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Robert Earl Johnson, Jr, inquiring as to why the previous district judge entered an order of recusal. Note: Johnson was mailed copy of Order #5 . (mg) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT filed by Robert Earl Johnson, Jr re #1 Complaint. (mg) (Main Document 6 replaced on 7/12/2019) (mg). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. #2 ). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis shows that he has an available balance of $1241.69 in his inmate trust account. (Doc. No. 2 at 3). His average monthly balance for the reported period was $1305.73. It appears, then, that Plaintiff has sufficient financial resources from which to pay the full filing fee in advance. Therefore, his application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. #2 ) is DENIED. In order to proceed with this action, Plaintiff must submit the full civil filing fee of $400 to the Court within 30 days of receiving this Order. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/9/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL: I hereby recuse myself in this matter. All dates and deadlines will remain in effect pending further Order of the court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 6/26/2019. (Note: This action has been assigned to District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr.) (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (mg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| (Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included) (afs) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Robert Earl Johnson, Jr. (afs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jodie Bell, William Cohen, Karl Dean, Dan Hamm, Sean O'Neill, Wendy Tucker, filed by Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.(afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
