Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00099
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Karl Pentecost v. LA Sfty Assn Timbermen
as 19-30602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARL DEAN PENTECOST
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA SAFETY ASSOCIATION OF TIMBERMEN - SELF INSURERS FUND
Johnson v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2019cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
William Cohen, Dan Hamm, Sean O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pentecost v. Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen Self Insurers Fund
as 3:2018cv01610
Plaintiff:
Karl Dean Pentecost
Defendant:
Louisiana Safety Association Of Timbermen - Self Insurers Fund and Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen Self Insurers Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Delvin Samuels, II v. Metro Nashville Government, et al
as 15-5400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELVIN C. SAMUELS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT, KARL DEAN, Mayor, STEVE ANDERSON, Chief of Police and others
Samuels v. Metro Nashville Government et al
as 3:2015cv00265
Plaintiff:
Delvin C. Samuels, II
Defendant:
Metro Nashville Government, Karl Dean, Steve Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
Karl Dean Moore
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Moore v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00320
Petitioner:
Karl Dean Moore
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv04603
Plaintiff:
United States of America and John Karl Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bunch v. City of Nashville et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bunch
Defendant:
City of Nashville, T.B.I., Ashland City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
