Morton v. Bedford County Jail et al
Christopher Morton |
Bedford County Jail, Bedford County Police Department, Shane Martin, DTF, Shane George, Daughtry Shean and Sam Bragg |
3:2021cv00718 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court is thus unable to determine Plaintiff's eligibility for pauper status. Due to his failure to comply with Section 1915(a)(2), Plaintiff's pending IFP application (Doc. No. #4 ) is DENIEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE to his filing of a second, properly supported application. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/28/2021. (xc:Pro se party sent this order and a blank IFP application (short form) by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christopher Morton. (jm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (jm) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Morton.(jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.