Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Anthony Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 23-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ERIN GAFFNEY, Facility Administrator, BRIAN DAVIS, Security Administrator and others
Anthony Martin v. Erin Gaffney
as 23-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN GAFFNEY, LISA YOUNG, RAY WALKER and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH/CORRECT CARE
Labra et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Lisbeth Labra and Kameron Hines
Defendant:
Shane Martin and Avery Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martin v. Wellpath/Correct Care et al
as 4:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Wellpath/Correct Care, Erin Gaffney, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barnhill v. Lofton
as 22-50235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody Everett Barnhill
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden David Lofton, Assistant Warden Chimdi A. Akwitti, Assistant Warden Nick Clayton and others
Earls v. Franks et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Ashley Worcester, Shane Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Bedford County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00718
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail, Bedford County Police Department, Shane Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhill v. Lofton
as 21-50072
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Warden Nick Clayton, LVN Tiffany Richardson, Steven Vass and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody Everett Barnhill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
