Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Anthony Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 23-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ERIN GAFFNEY, Facility Administrator, BRIAN DAVIS, Security Administrator and others
Anthony Martin v. Erin Gaffney
as 23-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN GAFFNEY, LISA YOUNG, RAY WALKER and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH/CORRECT CARE
Martin v. Wellpath/Correct Care et al
as 4:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Wellpath/Correct Care, Erin Gaffney, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barnhill v. Lofton
as 22-50235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody Everett Barnhill
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden David Lofton, Assistant Warden Chimdi A. Akwitti, Assistant Warden Nick Clayton and others
Earls v. Franks et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Ashley Worcester, Shane Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Bedford County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00718
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail, Bedford County Police Department, Shane Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhill v. Loftin
as 6:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Major Beau Smith, Sr., Lt. FNU Ross, Major Lawrence H. Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. USA
as 2:2016cv00533
Petitioner:
Ryan Shane Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Bert Smith
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Crossroads To Freedom, Giordano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
