Vandenburg v. Phillips et al
Brandon R. Vandenburg |
Shawn Phillips and State of Tennessee |
3:2024cv00989 |
August 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Nicholas S. Bolduc admitted to this court. (mg) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas S. Bolduc on behalf of Shawn Phillips (Bolduc, Nicholas) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for John H. Bledsoe, III admitted to this court. (mg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bledsoe, III on behalf of Shawn Phillips (Bledsoe, John) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (am) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brandon R. Vandenburg. (am) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brandon R. Vandenburg. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Grounds for Habeas Corpus Relief, #2 Attachment Direct Appeal Opinion, #3 Attachment Post-Conviction Opinion)(am) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.